Looking into the future the Pelican feeding its young from a self-induced wound in its own
breast (as depicted, mysteriously, on the state flag of Louisiana) is accepted as an
appropriate symbol of both self-sacrifice and rebirth. Through his selfless efforts, man is
raised from the slavery of ignorance to the condition of freedom conferred by wisdom.
Given the current state of affairs in Louisiana, one hopes that the understanding of the Pelican
as a symbol shall point the way towards a new consciousness of ourselves as a whole, and lead us
to face our futures with strength, grace, wisdom and faith, to learn from our mistakes and carry
our successes and zest for living to future generations.
Bush Impeachment Not Out of the Question
By James Ridgeway
Reprinted from: http://www.villagevoice.com
Village Voice
From Spying to Blame, Congress riled over abuse of power
Even as President Bush accuses the Democrats of imperiling national security by revealing his secret
spying program both he
and Vice President Cheney move closer to a serious confrontation with Congress over constitutional power. For the first time
since their election in 2000, both face open rebuke in Congress. Impeachment may not be as far-fetched as it might at first
seem.
Georgia Democratic congressman
John Lewis said Bush should be impeached if he broke the law in authorizing spying on
Americans. “It's a very serious charge, but he violated the law,” said Lewis. “The president should abide by the law. He
deliberately, systematically violated the law. He is not king, he is president.”
Cheney already is likely to face serious questioning and possible indictment for his role in the
Plame leak case. He appears
to have been the official who ordered his top aide, Scooter Libby, and possibly others to initiate the plot. Speculation is
that the vice president may have to retire from office, perhaps citing health problems.
Tuesday, in a stopover in Pakistan, Cheney argued Bush administration was seeking broader executive powers in an era
following Vietnam and Watergate—a period he described as “the nadir of the modern presidency in terms of authority and
legitimacy.”
(Of course Cheney and other conservatives now in power long have argued for a return of all federal power to the states, and
have vigorously opposed measures aimed at extending the reach of the presidency and federal government.So, his arguments now
seem a bit bizarre.)
John E. Sununu, the Republican senator, from New Hampshire told the Washington Post, “The vice president may be the only
person I know of that believes the executive has somehow lost power over the last 30 years.”
Bush is faced with an open split in Republican ranks in Congress, with Arlen Specter, chair of the Senate Judiciary
Committee, calling for a joint investigation of Congress into the spy program. Both Nebraska’s Chuck Hagel and Maine’s
Olympia Snowe are openly critical of the Bush
plans.
Meanwhile James Robertson, a federal district judge sitting on the secret FISA court,
resigned from that position. He gave
no reason, but associates were quoted in the Washington Post this morning as saying he felt the spy program information
might have been used to obtain FISA warrants. Colleen Kolla-Kotelly, the federal judge who chairs the panel expressed
similar misgivings in2004. “They just don't know if the product of wiretaps were used for FISA warrants—to kind of cleanse
the information,” one source told the paper. “What I've heard some of the judges say is they feel they've participated in a
Potemkin court.”
Without saying so flat-out, West Virginia’s senior Democratic senator,
Robert Byrd, this week set forth the case for
impeachment:
"The President claims that these powers are within his role as Commander in Chief,” Byrd said in a December 19 statement.
"Make no mistake, the powers granted to the Commander in Chief are specifically those as head of the Armed Forces. These
warrantless searches are conducted not against a foreign power, but against unsuspecting and unknowing American citizens.
They are conducted against individuals living on American soil, not in Iraq or Afghanistan. There is nothing within the
powers granted in the Commander in Chief clause that grants the President the ability to conduct clandestine surveillance of
American civilians. We must not allow such groundless, foolish claims to stand.
"The President claims a boundless authority through the resolution that authorized the war on those who perpetrated the
September 11th attacks. But that resolution does not give the President unchecked power to spy on our own people. That
resolution does not give the Administration the power to create covert prisons for secret prisoners. That resolution does
not authorize the torture of prisoners to extract information from them. That resolution does not authorize running
black-hole secret prisons in foreign countries to get around U.S. law. That resolution does not give the President the
powers reserved only for kings and potentates."
© 2005 Village Voice Media, Inc.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Save Our Wetlands Inc.(SOWL) has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Save Our Wetlands Inc.(SOWL) endorsed or sponsored by the originator. For more information go to:
www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.